↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Amisulpride versus other atypical antipsychotics for schizophrenia

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (92nd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (72nd percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
5 X users
wikipedia
6 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
43 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
140 Mendeley
Title
Amisulpride versus other atypical antipsychotics for schizophrenia
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2010
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd006624.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Katja Komossa, Christine Rummel‐Kluge, Heike Hunger, Franziska Schmid, Sandra Schwarz, Joaquim I Silveira da Mota Neto, Werner Kissling, Stefan Leucht

Abstract

In many countries of the industrialised world second generation (atypical) antipsychotics have become first line drug treatments for people with schizophrenia. The question as to whether, and if so how much, the effects of the various second generation antipsychotics differ is a matter of debate. In this review we examine how the efficacy and tolerability of amisulpride differs from that of other second generation antipsychotics.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 140 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Chile 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Unknown 137 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 22 16%
Student > Master 19 14%
Student > Bachelor 15 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 12 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 9%
Other 25 18%
Unknown 35 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 49 35%
Psychology 18 13%
Nursing and Health Professions 11 8%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 6 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 4%
Other 11 8%
Unknown 40 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 January 2022.
All research outputs
#2,799,234
of 25,457,858 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#5,432
of 11,499 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#13,609
of 172,589 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#32
of 115 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,457,858 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,499 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 40.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 172,589 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 115 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.