↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Treatment including anthracyclines versus treatment not including anthracyclines for childhood cancer

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, September 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (90th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (63rd percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
2 blogs
twitter
1 X user
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
43 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
185 Mendeley
Title
Treatment including anthracyclines versus treatment not including anthracyclines for childhood cancer
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, September 2014
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd006647.pub4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Elvira C van Dalen, Martine F Raphaël, Huib N Caron, Leontien CM Kremer

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 185 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Unknown 183 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 32 17%
Researcher 23 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 23 12%
Student > Bachelor 20 11%
Other 13 7%
Other 26 14%
Unknown 48 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 78 42%
Nursing and Health Professions 10 5%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 8 4%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 7 4%
Psychology 7 4%
Other 15 8%
Unknown 60 32%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 16. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 April 2020.
All research outputs
#2,300,908
of 25,457,858 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#4,736
of 11,499 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#23,581
of 249,480 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#83
of 225 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,457,858 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,499 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 40.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 249,480 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 225 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its contemporaries.