| Title |
Drug therapy for the management of cancer‐related fatigue
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2010
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd006704.pub3 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Ollie Minton, Alison Richardson, Michael Sharpe, Matthew Hotopf, Patrick Stone |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 16 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 6 | 38% |
| Australia | 1 | 6% |
| Canada | 1 | 6% |
| Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of | 1 | 6% |
| Unknown | 7 | 44% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 11 | 69% |
| Scientists | 4 | 25% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 6% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 219 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Australia | 3 | 1% |
| Switzerland | 2 | <1% |
| Canada | 2 | <1% |
| Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 208 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 35 | 16% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 20 | 9% |
| Researcher | 18 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 18 | 8% |
| Student > Bachelor | 17 | 8% |
| Other | 47 | 21% |
| Unknown | 64 | 29% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 80 | 37% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 21 | 10% |
| Psychology | 13 | 6% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 6 | 3% |
| Social Sciences | 6 | 3% |
| Other | 26 | 12% |
| Unknown | 67 | 31% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 November 2015.
All research outputs
#4,256,386
of 25,604,262 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#6,737
of 13,148 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#17,757
of 105,178 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#21
of 70 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,604,262 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,148 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.7. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 105,178 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 70 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.