↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Angioplasty versus bare metal stenting for superficial femoral artery lesions

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, June 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (81st percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
2 X users
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
51 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
188 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Angioplasty versus bare metal stenting for superficial femoral artery lesions
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, June 2014
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd006767.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Mohammed M Chowdhury, Alexander D McLain, Christopher P Twine

Abstract

Lower limb peripheral arterial disease (PAD) is a common, important manifestation of systemic atherosclerosis. Stenoses or occlusions in the superficial femoral artery may result in intermittent claudication or even critical ischaemia, which may be treated by balloon angioplasty with or without stenting. This is the first update of a review published in 2009.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 188 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Canada 1 <1%
Unknown 187 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 28 15%
Researcher 22 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 21 11%
Student > Bachelor 20 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 10 5%
Other 31 16%
Unknown 56 30%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 85 45%
Nursing and Health Professions 11 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 3%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 4 2%
Psychology 4 2%
Other 16 9%
Unknown 63 34%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 June 2019.
All research outputs
#4,781,425
of 25,457,858 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#6,916
of 11,842 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#43,956
of 243,104 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#145
of 241 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,457,858 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 81st percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,842 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 38.9. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 243,104 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 241 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.