↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Functional analysis‐based interventions for challenging behaviour in dementia

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, February 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (82nd percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (53rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
8 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
100 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
350 Mendeley
Title
Functional analysis‐based interventions for challenging behaviour in dementia
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, February 2012
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd006929.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Esme D Moniz Cook, Katie Swift, Ian James, Reem Malouf, Marjolein De Vugt, Frans Verhey

Abstract

Functional analysis (FA) for the management of challenging behaviour is a promising behavioural intervention that involves exploring the meaning or purpose of an individual's behaviour. It extends the 'ABC' approach of behavioural analysis, to overcome the restriction of having to derive a single explanatory hypothesis for the person's behaviour. It is seen as a first line alternative to traditional pharmacological management for agitation and aggression. FA typically requires the therapist to develop and evaluate hypotheses-driven strategies that aid family and staff caregivers to reduce or resolve a person's distress and its associated behavioural manifestations.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 350 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 3 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Sweden 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 341 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 61 17%
Researcher 50 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 43 12%
Student > Bachelor 42 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 24 7%
Other 55 16%
Unknown 75 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 80 23%
Psychology 59 17%
Nursing and Health Professions 54 15%
Social Sciences 21 6%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 7 2%
Other 46 13%
Unknown 83 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 December 2023.
All research outputs
#5,353,608
of 25,457,297 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#7,305
of 11,499 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#44,611
of 258,519 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#95
of 204 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,457,297 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 78th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,499 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 40.0. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 258,519 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 204 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its contemporaries.