| Title |
Treatment for idiopathic and hereditary neuralgic amyotrophy (brachial neuritis)
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2009
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd006976.pub2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Nens van Alfen, Baziel GM van Engelen, Richard AC Hughes |
| Abstract |
Neuralgic amyotrophy (also know as Parsonage-Turner syndrome or brachial plexus neuritis) is a distinct peripheral nervous system disorder characterised by episodes (attacks) of extreme neuropathic pain and rapid multifocal weakness and atrophy in the upper limbs. Neuralgic amyotrophy has both an idiopathic and hereditary form, with similar clinical symptoms but generally an earlier age of onset and more episodes in the hereditary form. The current hypothesis is that the episodes are caused by an immune-mediated response to the brachial plexus. Recovery is slow, in months to years, and many patients are left with residual pain and decreased exercise tolerance of the affected limb(s). Anecdotal evidence suggests that corticosteroids may relieve pain or help improve functional recovery. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Australia | 1 | 25% |
| France | 1 | 25% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 25% |
| Unknown | 1 | 25% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 4 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 207 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Switzerland | 2 | <1% |
| South Africa | 1 | <1% |
| India | 1 | <1% |
| Japan | 1 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 201 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 25 | 12% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 22 | 11% |
| Student > Master | 22 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 17 | 8% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 16 | 8% |
| Other | 46 | 22% |
| Unknown | 59 | 29% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 81 | 39% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 17 | 8% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 10 | 5% |
| Neuroscience | 8 | 4% |
| Psychology | 6 | 3% |
| Other | 17 | 8% |
| Unknown | 68 | 33% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 July 2023.
All research outputs
#8,571,053
of 25,457,858 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#9,070
of 11,842 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#41,884
of 121,978 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#50
of 69 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,457,858 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,842 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 38.9. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 121,978 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 69 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.