| Title |
Pregabalin for neuropathic pain in adults
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd007076.pub3 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Sheena Derry, Rae Frances Bell, Sebastian Straube, Philip J Wiffen, Dominic Aldington, R Andrew Moore |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 128 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 24 | 19% |
| Spain | 19 | 15% |
| Ecuador | 5 | 4% |
| Japan | 5 | 4% |
| Mexico | 4 | 3% |
| United States | 3 | 2% |
| Chile | 2 | 2% |
| Australia | 2 | 2% |
| Ireland | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 10 | 8% |
| Unknown | 52 | 41% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 99 | 77% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 20 | 16% |
| Scientists | 7 | 5% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 1 | <1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 648 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 648 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 79 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 72 | 11% |
| Researcher | 56 | 9% |
| Other | 44 | 7% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 44 | 7% |
| Other | 115 | 18% |
| Unknown | 238 | 37% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 187 | 29% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 57 | 9% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 43 | 7% |
| Neuroscience | 20 | 3% |
| Psychology | 14 | 2% |
| Other | 72 | 11% |
| Unknown | 255 | 39% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 99. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 March 2024.
All research outputs
#434,105
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#760
of 13,168 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#9,846
of 451,819 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#11
of 195 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,168 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 451,819 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 195 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.