| Title |
Dilute versus full‐strength formula in exclusively formula‐fed preterm or low birth weight infants
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, June 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd007263.pub3 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Fauziah Basuki, Diah R Hadiati, Tari Turner, Steve McDonald, Mohammad Hakimi |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 17 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Germany | 4 | 24% |
| Japan | 1 | 6% |
| Kyrgyzstan | 1 | 6% |
| Honduras | 1 | 6% |
| United States | 1 | 6% |
| France | 1 | 6% |
| Unknown | 8 | 47% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 15 | 88% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 6% |
| Scientists | 1 | 6% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 217 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 216 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 25 | 12% |
| Researcher | 20 | 9% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 18 | 8% |
| Student > Master | 18 | 8% |
| Other | 13 | 6% |
| Other | 31 | 14% |
| Unknown | 92 | 42% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 42 | 19% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 29 | 13% |
| Unspecified | 10 | 5% |
| Social Sciences | 9 | 4% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 6 | 3% |
| Other | 17 | 8% |
| Unknown | 104 | 48% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 20. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 November 2020.
All research outputs
#1,893,271
of 25,595,500 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#4,081
of 13,156 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#39,781
of 366,470 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#73
of 181 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,595,500 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,156 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 366,470 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 181 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its contemporaries.