| Title |
Perioperative glycaemic control for people with diabetes undergoing surgery
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, August 2023
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd007315.pub3 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Filip Bellon, Ivan Solà, Gabriel Gimenez-Perez, Marta Hernández, Maria-Inti Metzendorf, Esther Rubinat, Didac Mauricio |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 43 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 7 | 16% |
| United States | 6 | 14% |
| Japan | 3 | 7% |
| South Africa | 2 | 5% |
| Canada | 1 | 2% |
| Mexico | 1 | 2% |
| Australia | 1 | 2% |
| Congo, The Democratic Republic of the | 1 | 2% |
| Hong Kong | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 2 | 5% |
| Unknown | 18 | 42% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 28 | 65% |
| Scientists | 9 | 21% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 6 | 14% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 70 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 70 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unspecified | 11 | 16% |
| Other | 5 | 7% |
| Student > Bachelor | 4 | 6% |
| Researcher | 4 | 6% |
| Lecturer | 3 | 4% |
| Other | 10 | 14% |
| Unknown | 33 | 47% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 18 | 26% |
| Unspecified | 13 | 19% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 3 | 4% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 1 | 1% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 34 | 49% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 26. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 February 2024.
All research outputs
#1,524,176
of 25,759,158 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#3,229
of 13,137 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#27,000
of 361,948 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#26
of 130 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,759,158 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,137 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 361,948 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 130 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.