| Title |
Benzodiazepines for the relief of breathlessness in advanced malignant and non‐malignant diseases in adults
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2016
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd007354.pub3 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Steffen T Simon, Irene J Higginson, Sara Booth, Richard Harding, Vera Weingärtner, Claudia Bausewein |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 61 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 15 | 25% |
| Australia | 4 | 7% |
| United States | 4 | 7% |
| Spain | 4 | 7% |
| New Zealand | 3 | 5% |
| Canada | 2 | 3% |
| Rwanda | 1 | 2% |
| Japan | 1 | 2% |
| Curaçao | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 2 | 3% |
| Unknown | 24 | 39% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 37 | 61% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 12 | 20% |
| Scientists | 7 | 11% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 5 | 8% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 503 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 501 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 62 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 62 | 12% |
| Researcher | 48 | 10% |
| Other | 41 | 8% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 30 | 6% |
| Other | 84 | 17% |
| Unknown | 176 | 35% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 180 | 36% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 60 | 12% |
| Psychology | 13 | 3% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 12 | 2% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 10 | 2% |
| Other | 42 | 8% |
| Unknown | 186 | 37% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 54. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 April 2024.
All research outputs
#800,552
of 25,706,302 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#1,503
of 13,138 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#15,069
of 323,968 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#36
of 269 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,706,302 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,138 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 323,968 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 269 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.