Title |
Interventions for pain with intrauterine device insertion
|
---|---|
Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2015
|
DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd007373.pub3 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Laureen M Lopez, Alissa Bernholc, Yanwu Zeng, Rebecca H Allen, Deborah Bartz, Paul A O'Brien, David Hubacher |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 35 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 5 | 14% |
United Kingdom | 3 | 9% |
Japan | 2 | 6% |
Antarctica | 1 | 3% |
Canada | 1 | 3% |
France | 1 | 3% |
Unknown | 22 | 63% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 32 | 91% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 6% |
Scientists | 1 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 327 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 2 | <1% |
Switzerland | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 324 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 50 | 15% |
Researcher | 39 | 12% |
Student > Bachelor | 35 | 11% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 24 | 7% |
Other | 22 | 7% |
Other | 62 | 19% |
Unknown | 95 | 29% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 103 | 31% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 45 | 14% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 9 | 3% |
Psychology | 9 | 3% |
Social Sciences | 8 | 2% |
Other | 42 | 13% |
Unknown | 111 | 34% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 477. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 March 2024.
All research outputs
#57,209
of 25,758,211 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#109
of 13,138 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#499
of 276,209 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#3
of 281 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,758,211 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,138 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 276,209 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 281 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.