↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Surgical versus non‐surgical management of abdominal injury

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, November 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
f1000
1 research highlight platform

Citations

dimensions_citation
18 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
60 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Surgical versus non‐surgical management of abdominal injury
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, November 2012
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd007383.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Oyo-Ita A, Ugare UG, Ikpeme IA, Oyo-Ita, Angela, Ugare, Udey G, Ikpeme, Ikpeme A

Abstract

Injury to the abdomen can be blunt or penetrating. Abdominal injury can damage internal organs such as the liver, spleen, kidneys, and intestine. There are controversies about the best approach to manage abdominal injuries.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 60 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 1 2%
Unknown 59 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Postgraduate 10 17%
Researcher 9 15%
Other 8 13%
Student > Bachelor 6 10%
Student > Master 6 10%
Other 14 23%
Unknown 7 12%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 47 78%
Engineering 2 3%
Immunology and Microbiology 1 2%
Social Sciences 1 2%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 2%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 8 13%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 April 2013.
All research outputs
#13,375,146
of 22,691,736 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#10,072
of 12,303 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#97,175
of 179,006 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#197
of 236 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,691,736 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,303 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 30.3. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 179,006 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 236 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.