Title |
Anti‐vascular endothelial growth factor for diabetic macular oedema: a network meta‐analysis
|
---|---|
Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, June 2023
|
DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd007419.pub7 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Gianni Virgili, Katie Curran, Ersilia Lucenteforte, Tunde Peto, Mariacristina Parravano |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 12 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 2 | 17% |
Peru | 1 | 8% |
Spain | 1 | 8% |
United Kingdom | 1 | 8% |
Unknown | 7 | 58% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 8 | 67% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 4 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 40 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 40 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unspecified | 12 | 30% |
Researcher | 3 | 8% |
Student > Postgraduate | 2 | 5% |
Student > Master | 2 | 5% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 5% |
Other | 3 | 8% |
Unknown | 16 | 40% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unspecified | 12 | 30% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 5 | 13% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 5% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 3% |
Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 1 | 3% |
Other | 1 | 3% |
Unknown | 18 | 45% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 February 2024.
All research outputs
#3,332,131
of 25,738,558 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#6,069
of 13,137 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#58,914
of 376,662 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#64
of 131 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,738,558 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,137 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 376,662 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 131 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its contemporaries.