↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Surgical versus conservative interventions for treating acromioclavicular dislocation of the shoulder in adults

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (94th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (79th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
61 X users
facebook
3 Facebook pages
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
52 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
287 Mendeley
Title
Surgical versus conservative interventions for treating acromioclavicular dislocation of the shoulder in adults
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2019
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd007429.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Marcel JS Tamaoki, Mário Lenza, Fabio T Matsunaga, João Carlos Belloti, Marcelo H Matsumoto, Flávio Faloppa

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 61 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 287 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 287 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 39 14%
Student > Master 35 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 22 8%
Researcher 18 6%
Other 17 6%
Other 37 13%
Unknown 119 41%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 67 23%
Nursing and Health Professions 31 11%
Sports and Recreations 12 4%
Psychology 10 3%
Social Sciences 9 3%
Other 26 9%
Unknown 132 46%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 42. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 January 2023.
All research outputs
#979,574
of 25,462,162 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#1,947
of 12,090 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#21,480
of 367,799 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#33
of 159 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,462,162 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,090 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 38.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 367,799 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 159 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.