| Title |
Physical examination for lumbar radiculopathy due to disc herniation in patients with low‐back pain
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, February 2010
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd007431.pub2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Daniëlle AWM van der Windt, Emmanuel Simons, Ingrid I Riphagen, Carlo Ammendolia, Arianne P Verhagen, Mark Laslett, Walter Devillé, Rick A Deyo, Lex M Bouter, Henrica CW de Vet, Bert Aertgeerts |
| Abstract |
Low-back pain with leg pain (sciatica) may be caused by a herniated intervertebral disc exerting pressure on the nerve root. Most patients will respond to conservative treatment, but in carefully selected patients, surgical discectomy may provide faster relief of symptoms. Primary care clinicians use patient history and physical examination to evaluate the likelihood of disc herniation and select patients for further imaging and possible surgery. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 32 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 5 | 16% |
| United States | 5 | 16% |
| Spain | 3 | 9% |
| Brazil | 2 | 6% |
| New Zealand | 2 | 6% |
| Japan | 1 | 3% |
| Finland | 1 | 3% |
| France | 1 | 3% |
| Canada | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 3 | 9% |
| Unknown | 8 | 25% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 25 | 78% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 4 | 13% |
| Scientists | 3 | 9% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 618 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 4 | <1% |
| Switzerland | 3 | <1% |
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| Chile | 1 | <1% |
| Italy | 1 | <1% |
| Australia | 1 | <1% |
| Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
| New Zealand | 1 | <1% |
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 2 | <1% |
| Unknown | 602 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 107 | 17% |
| Student > Bachelor | 97 | 16% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 41 | 7% |
| Other | 38 | 6% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 36 | 6% |
| Other | 104 | 17% |
| Unknown | 195 | 32% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 212 | 34% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 114 | 18% |
| Sports and Recreations | 17 | 3% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 10 | 2% |
| Social Sciences | 10 | 2% |
| Other | 37 | 6% |
| Unknown | 218 | 35% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 44. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 May 2023.
All research outputs
#946,020
of 25,504,429 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#1,867
of 13,142 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,826
of 103,316 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#13
of 135 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,504,429 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,142 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 103,316 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 135 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.