| Title |
Interventions to enhance return‐to‐work for cancer patients
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, February 2011
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd007569.pub2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
de Boer AG, Taskila T, Tamminga SJ, Frings-Dresen MH, Feuerstein M, Verbeek JH |
| Abstract |
Cancer survivors are 1.4 times more likely to be unemployed than healthy people. It is therefore important to provide cancer patients with programmes to support the return-to-work process. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 14 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Finland | 4 | 29% |
| Canada | 2 | 14% |
| Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of | 2 | 14% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 7% |
| Spain | 1 | 7% |
| Panama | 1 | 7% |
| Unknown | 3 | 21% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 12 | 86% |
| Scientists | 2 | 14% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 114 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 4 | 4% |
| New Zealand | 1 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 108 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 14 | 12% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 12 | 11% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 12 | 11% |
| Student > Master | 11 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 10 | 9% |
| Other | 33 | 29% |
| Unknown | 22 | 19% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 34 | 30% |
| Social Sciences | 13 | 11% |
| Psychology | 12 | 11% |
| Computer Science | 7 | 6% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 6 | 5% |
| Other | 15 | 13% |
| Unknown | 27 | 24% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 February 2015.
All research outputs
#3,120,017
of 24,169,085 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#5,902
of 12,855 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#13,483
of 109,197 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#36
of 102 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,169,085 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,855 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 33.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 109,197 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 102 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.