| Title |
Medical methods for preventing blood loss at caesarean section
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, February 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd007576.pub2 |
| Authors |
Frances J Kellie |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 18 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 18 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Other | 4 | 22% |
| Student > Bachelor | 3 | 17% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 1 | 6% |
| Student > Master | 1 | 6% |
| Researcher | 1 | 6% |
| Other | 1 | 6% |
| Unknown | 7 | 39% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 6 | 33% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 2 | 11% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 11% |
| Unknown | 8 | 44% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 52. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 October 2023.
All research outputs
#807,284
of 25,461,852 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#1,537
of 12,090 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#19,409
of 452,034 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#35
of 169 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,461,852 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,090 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 38.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 452,034 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 169 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.