Title |
Monetary incentives for schizophrenia
|
---|---|
Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2009
|
DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd007626.pub2 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Rosanna Michalczuk, Amy Mitchell |
Abstract |
There is evidence suggesting that people with serious mental illness are less responsive to everyday social rewards such as praise. Motivation and performance in social situations can be poor. Rewarding of tasks with money improves motivation to complete the tasks in everyday life. Careful use of targeted monetary rewards could also help people with troublesome symptoms of schizophrenia. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 1 | 33% |
Unknown | 2 | 67% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 3 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 115 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Greece | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 114 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 19 | 17% |
Researcher | 15 | 13% |
Student > Master | 13 | 11% |
Student > Bachelor | 12 | 10% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 6 | 5% |
Other | 20 | 17% |
Unknown | 30 | 26% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Psychology | 24 | 21% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 21 | 18% |
Social Sciences | 10 | 9% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 8 | 7% |
Decision Sciences | 6 | 5% |
Other | 13 | 11% |
Unknown | 33 | 29% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 July 2016.
All research outputs
#17,348,916
of 25,457,858 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#10,493
of 11,499 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#90,430
of 106,969 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#66
of 82 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,457,858 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,499 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 40.0. This one is in the 6th percentile – i.e., 6% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 106,969 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 82 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.