| Title |
Nebuliser systems for drug delivery in cystic fibrosis
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd007639.pub2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Tracey Daniels, Nicola Mills, Paul Whitaker |
| Abstract |
Nebuliser systems are used to deliver medications to control the symptoms and the progression of lung disease in people with cystic fibrosis. Many types of nebuliser systems are available for use with various medications; however, there has been no previous systematic review which has evaluated these systems. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 4 | 44% |
| Spain | 1 | 11% |
| Unknown | 4 | 44% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 8 | 89% |
| Scientists | 1 | 11% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 197 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Italy | 1 | <1% |
| South Africa | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 195 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 28 | 14% |
| Student > Bachelor | 28 | 14% |
| Researcher | 22 | 11% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 19 | 10% |
| Other | 16 | 8% |
| Other | 30 | 15% |
| Unknown | 54 | 27% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 67 | 34% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 14 | 7% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 12 | 6% |
| Psychology | 12 | 6% |
| Social Sciences | 6 | 3% |
| Other | 20 | 10% |
| Unknown | 66 | 34% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 20. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 June 2013.
All research outputs
#1,844,153
of 25,461,852 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#3,945
of 12,090 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#14,851
of 204,412 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#76
of 265 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,461,852 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,090 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 38.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 204,412 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 265 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.