↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

High‐dose therapy with autologous stem cell transplantation versus chemotherapy or immuno‐chemotherapy for follicular lymphoma in adults

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
45 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
171 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
Title
High‐dose therapy with autologous stem cell transplantation versus chemotherapy or immuno‐chemotherapy for follicular lymphoma in adults
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2012
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd007678.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Markus Schaaf, Marcel Reiser, Peter Borchmann, Andreas Engert, Nicole Skoetz

Abstract

Follicular lymphoma (FL) is the most common indolent and second most common Non-Hodgkin`s lymphoma (NHL) in the Western world. Standard treatment usually includes rituximab and chemotherapy. High-dose therapy (HDT) followed by autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) is an option for patients in advanced stages or for second-line therapy, leading to improved progression-free survival (PFS) rates. However, the impact of HDT and ASCT remains unclear, as there are hints of an increased risk of second cancers.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 171 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Ecuador 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Unknown 169 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 23 13%
Student > Bachelor 19 11%
Researcher 18 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 15 9%
Student > Postgraduate 10 6%
Other 31 18%
Unknown 55 32%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 74 43%
Nursing and Health Professions 11 6%
Psychology 6 4%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 3%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 5 3%
Other 13 8%
Unknown 57 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 March 2013.
All research outputs
#16,783,081
of 25,457,297 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#10,370
of 11,499 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#168,545
of 251,889 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#174
of 227 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,457,297 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,499 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 40.0. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 251,889 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 227 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.