↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Non‐surgical interventions for acute internal hordeolum

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (96th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
26 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
twitter
13 X users
wikipedia
12 Wikipedia pages
video
1 YouTube creator

Citations

dimensions_citation
25 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
218 Mendeley
Title
Non‐surgical interventions for acute internal hordeolum
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2017
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd007742.pub4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Kristina Lindsley, Jason J Nichols, Kay Dickersin

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 13 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 218 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 218 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 41 19%
Student > Master 19 9%
Student > Postgraduate 18 8%
Researcher 11 5%
Other 10 5%
Other 21 10%
Unknown 98 45%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 74 34%
Nursing and Health Professions 17 8%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 2%
Immunology and Microbiology 3 1%
Computer Science 2 <1%
Other 13 6%
Unknown 104 48%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 224. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 March 2024.
All research outputs
#172,386
of 25,595,500 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#299
of 13,156 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,755
of 424,044 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#12
of 276 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,595,500 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,156 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 424,044 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 276 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.