↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Interventions for clinical and subclinical hypothyroidism pre‐pregnancy and during pregnancy

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, May 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (91st percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (64th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
policy
1 policy source
twitter
1 X user
wikipedia
4 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
97 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
425 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Interventions for clinical and subclinical hypothyroidism pre‐pregnancy and during pregnancy
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, May 2013
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd007752.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sally M Reid, Philippa Middleton, Mary C Cossich, Caroline A Crowther, Emily Bain

Abstract

Over the last decade there has been enhanced awareness of the appreciable morbidity of thyroid dysfunction, particularly thyroid deficiency. Since treating clinical and subclinical hypothyroidism may reduce adverse obstetric outcomes, it is crucial to identify which interventions are safe and effective.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 425 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Turkey 1 <1%
Ethiopia 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Unknown 421 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 55 13%
Student > Bachelor 51 12%
Researcher 45 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 36 8%
Other 32 8%
Other 80 19%
Unknown 126 30%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 180 42%
Nursing and Health Professions 32 8%
Psychology 16 4%
Social Sciences 13 3%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 8 2%
Other 39 9%
Unknown 137 32%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 16. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 December 2018.
All research outputs
#2,211,627
of 25,457,858 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#4,602
of 11,842 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#18,343
of 207,187 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#100
of 284 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,457,858 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,842 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 38.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 207,187 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 284 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its contemporaries.