| Title |
Oral non‐steroidal anti‐inflammatory drugs versus other oral analgesic agents for acute soft tissue injury
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, August 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd007789.pub3 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Peter Jones, Rain Lamdin, Stuart R Dalziel |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 77 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 24 | 31% |
| United Kingdom | 6 | 8% |
| Argentina | 3 | 4% |
| Belgium | 2 | 3% |
| Bosnia and Herzegovina | 1 | 1% |
| France | 1 | 1% |
| United States | 1 | 1% |
| Tanzania, United Republic of | 1 | 1% |
| Germany | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 3 | 4% |
| Unknown | 34 | 44% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 65 | 84% |
| Scientists | 5 | 6% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 5 | 6% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 1 | 1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 291 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 290 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 37 | 13% |
| Student > Master | 30 | 10% |
| Other | 21 | 7% |
| Researcher | 18 | 6% |
| Professor | 12 | 4% |
| Other | 53 | 18% |
| Unknown | 120 | 41% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 82 | 28% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 22 | 8% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 9 | 3% |
| Sports and Recreations | 8 | 3% |
| Psychology | 8 | 3% |
| Other | 31 | 11% |
| Unknown | 131 | 45% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 49. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 October 2023.
All research outputs
#861,398
of 25,462,162 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#1,674
of 12,090 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#25,117
of 426,167 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#34
of 152 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,462,162 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,090 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 38.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 426,167 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 152 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.