| Title |
Antibacterial agents in composite restorations for the prevention of dental caries
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, December 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd007819.pub3 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Tatiana Pereira‐Cenci, Maximiliano S Cenci, Zbys Fedorowicz, Marina Azevedo |
| Abstract |
Dental caries is a multifactorial disease in which the fermentation of food sugars by bacteria from the biofilm (dental plaque) leads to localised demineralisation of tooth surfaces, which may ultimately result in cavity formation. Resin composites are widely used in dentistry to restore teeth. These restorations can fail for a number of reasons, such as secondary caries, and restorative material fracture and other minor reasons. From these, secondary caries, which are caries lesions developed adjacent to restorations, is the main cause for restorations replacement. The presence of antibacterials in both the filling material and the bonding systems would theoretically be able to affect the initiation and progression of caries adjacent to restorations. This is an update of the Cochrane review published in 2009. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 17 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 3 | 18% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 12% |
| Spain | 1 | 6% |
| Canada | 1 | 6% |
| Chile | 1 | 6% |
| Côte d'Ivoire | 1 | 6% |
| Unknown | 8 | 47% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 8 | 47% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 7 | 41% |
| Scientists | 2 | 12% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 191 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 191 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 25 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 22 | 12% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 17 | 9% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 13 | 7% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 13 | 7% |
| Other | 34 | 18% |
| Unknown | 67 | 35% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 89 | 47% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 4 | 2% |
| Materials Science | 4 | 2% |
| Engineering | 4 | 2% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 3 | 2% |
| Other | 16 | 8% |
| Unknown | 71 | 37% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 24. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 August 2017.
All research outputs
#1,587,487
of 25,595,500 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#3,410
of 13,156 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#16,492
of 308,697 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#70
of 235 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,595,500 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,156 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 308,697 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 235 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.