↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Biologics for rheumatoid arthritis: an overview of Cochrane reviews

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2009
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (91st percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (76th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
policy
1 policy source
facebook
2 Facebook pages
wikipedia
10 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
223 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
260 Mendeley
Title
Biologics for rheumatoid arthritis: an overview of Cochrane reviews
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2009
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd007848.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jasvinder A Singh, Robin Christensen, George A Wells, Maria E Suarez‐Almazor, Rachelle Buchbinder, Maria Angeles Lopez‐Olivo, Elizabeth Tanjong Ghogomu, Peter Tugwell

Abstract

The biologic disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (DMARDs) are very effective in treating rheumatoid arthritis (RA), however there is a lack of head-to-head comparison studies.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 260 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Portugal 1 <1%
Colombia 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Finland 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Sri Lanka 1 <1%
Belgium 1 <1%
China 1 <1%
Other 1 <1%
Unknown 250 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 51 20%
Researcher 31 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 30 12%
Other 21 8%
Student > Bachelor 19 7%
Other 46 18%
Unknown 62 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 105 40%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 18 7%
Nursing and Health Professions 16 6%
Psychology 9 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 2%
Other 33 13%
Unknown 73 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 14. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 November 2023.
All research outputs
#2,586,503
of 25,457,858 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#5,154
of 11,499 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#8,583
of 106,969 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#19
of 82 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,457,858 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,499 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 40.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 106,969 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 82 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.