↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Endoscopic or surgical intervention for painful obstructive chronic pancreatitis

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, March 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (73rd percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
80 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
170 Mendeley
Title
Endoscopic or surgical intervention for painful obstructive chronic pancreatitis
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, March 2015
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd007884.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Usama Ahmed Ali, Johanna M Pahlplatz, Wiliam H Nealon, Harry van Goor, Hein G Gooszen, Marja A Boermeester

Abstract

Endoscopy and surgery are the treatment modalities of choice for patients with chronic pancreatitis and dilated pancreatic duct (obstructive chronic pancreatitis). Physicians face, without clear consensus, the choice between endoscopy or surgery for this group of patients.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 170 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
India 1 <1%
Unknown 169 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 25 15%
Student > Master 25 15%
Other 14 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 12 7%
Student > Bachelor 10 6%
Other 36 21%
Unknown 48 28%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 72 42%
Nursing and Health Professions 13 8%
Psychology 5 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 2%
Computer Science 2 1%
Other 14 8%
Unknown 61 36%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 April 2022.
All research outputs
#6,783,328
of 25,457,858 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#7,921
of 11,842 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#73,603
of 278,796 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#175
of 266 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,457,858 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,842 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 38.9. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 278,796 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 266 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.