| Title |
Vaginal preparation with antiseptic solution before cesarean section for preventing postoperative infections
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd007892.pub7 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
David M Haas, Sarah Morgan, Karenrose Contreras, Savannah Kimball |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 31 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Netherlands | 3 | 10% |
| France | 3 | 10% |
| Spain | 2 | 6% |
| Colombia | 2 | 6% |
| Australia | 2 | 6% |
| Austria | 1 | 3% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 3% |
| Egypt | 1 | 3% |
| El Salvador | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 3 | 10% |
| Unknown | 12 | 39% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 19 | 61% |
| Scientists | 10 | 32% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 6% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 224 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 224 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 24 | 11% |
| Researcher | 22 | 10% |
| Other | 15 | 7% |
| Student > Bachelor | 13 | 6% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 10 | 4% |
| Other | 20 | 9% |
| Unknown | 120 | 54% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 45 | 20% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 20 | 9% |
| Social Sciences | 8 | 4% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 1% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 3 | 1% |
| Other | 14 | 6% |
| Unknown | 131 | 58% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 30. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 December 2021.
All research outputs
#1,327,596
of 25,728,855 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#2,792
of 13,136 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#36,953
of 408,017 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#53
of 196 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,728,855 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,136 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 408,017 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 196 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.