| Title |
Enhanced care by generalists for functional somatic symptoms and disorders in primary care
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd008142.pub2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Marianne Rosendal, Annette H Blankenstein, Richard Morriss, Per Fink, Michael Sharpe, Christopher Burton |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 12 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 3 | 25% |
| United Kingdom | 3 | 25% |
| India | 1 | 8% |
| Chile | 1 | 8% |
| Unknown | 4 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 8 | 67% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 17% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 8% |
| Scientists | 1 | 8% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 413 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Portugal | 1 | <1% |
| Denmark | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 410 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 66 | 16% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 52 | 13% |
| Researcher | 51 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 43 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 26 | 6% |
| Other | 74 | 18% |
| Unknown | 101 | 24% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 101 | 24% |
| Psychology | 76 | 18% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 45 | 11% |
| Social Sciences | 25 | 6% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 6 | 1% |
| Other | 42 | 10% |
| Unknown | 118 | 29% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 August 2014.
All research outputs
#5,284,655
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#7,468
of 13,149 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#45,494
of 226,758 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#127
of 212 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,149 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.8. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 226,758 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 212 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.