| Title |
Workplace interventions for neck pain in workers
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2011
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd008160.pub2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Randi Wågø Aas, Hanne Tuntland, Kari Anne Holte, Cecilie Røe, Thomas Lund, Staffan Marklund, Anders Moller |
| Abstract |
Musculoskeletal disorders are the most common cause of disability in many industrial countries. Recurrent and chronic pain accounts for a substantial portion of workers' absenteeism. Neck pain seems to be more prominent in the general population than previously known. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Chile | 1 | 25% |
| Sweden | 1 | 25% |
| Unknown | 2 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 75% |
| Scientists | 1 | 25% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 414 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 4 | <1% |
| Switzerland | 2 | <1% |
| Brazil | 2 | <1% |
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| Ireland | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| India | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 402 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 76 | 18% |
| Student > Bachelor | 50 | 12% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 47 | 11% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 31 | 7% |
| Researcher | 29 | 7% |
| Other | 89 | 21% |
| Unknown | 92 | 22% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 118 | 29% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 50 | 12% |
| Social Sciences | 30 | 7% |
| Psychology | 26 | 6% |
| Computer Science | 11 | 3% |
| Other | 63 | 15% |
| Unknown | 116 | 28% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 35. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 April 2021.
All research outputs
#1,150,039
of 25,457,858 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#2,357
of 11,499 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,386
of 120,465 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#7
of 98 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,457,858 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,499 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 40.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 120,465 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 98 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.