↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Treatment of obstructive sleep apnoea for chronic cough in children

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2011
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
10 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
124 Mendeley
Title
Treatment of obstructive sleep apnoea for chronic cough in children
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2011
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd008182.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Laurel Teoh, Mark Hurwitz, Jason P Acworth, Peter van Asperen, Anne B Chang

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 124 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
South Africa 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Unknown 122 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 19 15%
Student > Bachelor 17 14%
Researcher 14 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 5%
Other 20 16%
Unknown 37 30%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 50 40%
Nursing and Health Professions 12 10%
Social Sciences 4 3%
Psychology 3 2%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 3 2%
Other 9 7%
Unknown 43 35%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 October 2019.
All research outputs
#8,571,053
of 25,457,858 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#9,070
of 11,842 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#44,843
of 120,465 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#67
of 99 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,457,858 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,842 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 38.9. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 120,465 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 99 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.