| Title |
Flow‐cycled versus time‐cycled synchronized ventilation for neonates
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2010
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd008246.pub2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Sven M Schulzke, Jane Pillow, Ben Ewald, Sanjay K Patole |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 101 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| France | 1 | <1% |
| Australia | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 99 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 18 | 18% |
| Student > Master | 11 | 11% |
| Researcher | 8 | 8% |
| Professor | 6 | 6% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 5 | 5% |
| Other | 20 | 20% |
| Unknown | 33 | 33% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 36 | 36% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 11 | 11% |
| Psychology | 5 | 5% |
| Social Sciences | 3 | 3% |
| Materials Science | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 8 | 8% |
| Unknown | 36 | 36% |