| Title |
Physical health care monitoring for people with serious mental illness
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd008298.pub3 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Graeme Tosh, Andrew V Clifton, Jun Xia, Margueritte M White |
| Abstract |
Current guidance suggests that we should monitor the physical health of people with serious mental illness, and there has been a significant financial investment over recent years to provide this. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 2 | 20% |
| France | 1 | 10% |
| Canada | 1 | 10% |
| Unknown | 6 | 60% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 6 | 60% |
| Scientists | 2 | 20% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 10% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 10% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 262 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 261 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 41 | 16% |
| Researcher | 32 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 29 | 11% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 24 | 9% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 16 | 6% |
| Other | 41 | 16% |
| Unknown | 79 | 30% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 86 | 33% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 29 | 11% |
| Psychology | 24 | 9% |
| Social Sciences | 12 | 5% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 6 | 2% |
| Other | 18 | 7% |
| Unknown | 87 | 33% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 15. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 February 2020.
All research outputs
#2,435,068
of 25,728,855 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#4,922
of 13,136 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#27,164
of 321,930 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#106
of 250 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,728,855 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,136 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 321,930 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 250 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its contemporaries.