| Title |
Thromboprophylaxis for trauma patients
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, March 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd008303.pub2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Luis M Barrera, Pablo Perel, Katharine Ker, Roberto Cirocchi, Eriberto Farinella, Carlos Hernando Morales Uribe |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 20 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Canada | 3 | 15% |
| Colombia | 2 | 10% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 10% |
| Malaysia | 1 | 5% |
| United States | 1 | 5% |
| India | 1 | 5% |
| Unknown | 10 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 14 | 70% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 5 | 25% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 5% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 344 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Colombia | 2 | <1% |
| Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| South Africa | 1 | <1% |
| Mexico | 1 | <1% |
| Japan | 1 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 336 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 48 | 14% |
| Researcher | 36 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 35 | 10% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 34 | 10% |
| Other | 29 | 8% |
| Other | 78 | 23% |
| Unknown | 84 | 24% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 176 | 51% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 21 | 6% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 7 | 2% |
| Social Sciences | 6 | 2% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 5 | 1% |
| Other | 27 | 8% |
| Unknown | 102 | 30% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 26. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 July 2019.
All research outputs
#1,493,699
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#3,176
of 13,149 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#11,385
of 213,048 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#43
of 213 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,149 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 213,048 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 213 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.