↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Pneumatic retinopexy versus scleral buckle for repairing simple rhegmatogenous retinal detachments

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, November 2021
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (59th percentile)

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
11 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
74 Mendeley
Title
Pneumatic retinopexy versus scleral buckle for repairing simple rhegmatogenous retinal detachments
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, November 2021
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd008350.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Dayse F Sena, Raphael Kilian, Su-Hsun Liu, Stanislao Rizzo, Gianni Virgili

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 74 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 74 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 11%
Student > Master 6 8%
Other 5 7%
Researcher 5 7%
Student > Bachelor 5 7%
Other 5 7%
Unknown 40 54%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 12 16%
Psychology 4 5%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 4%
Unspecified 2 3%
Business, Management and Accounting 2 3%
Other 7 9%
Unknown 44 59%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 April 2022.
All research outputs
#8,675,798
of 25,711,518 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#9,730
of 13,134 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#164,094
of 440,883 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#147
of 171 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,711,518 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,134 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.7. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 440,883 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 171 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.