| Title |
Interventions for replacing missing teeth: augmentation procedures of the maxillary sinus
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, May 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd008397.pub2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Marco Esposito, Pietro Felice, Helen V Worthington |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 28 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 6 | 21% |
| United States | 2 | 7% |
| Spain | 2 | 7% |
| Chile | 2 | 7% |
| Canada | 1 | 4% |
| Saudi Arabia | 1 | 4% |
| Ireland | 1 | 4% |
| Côte d'Ivoire | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 12 | 43% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 15 | 54% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 10 | 36% |
| Scientists | 2 | 7% |
| Unknown | 1 | 4% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 586 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 3 | <1% |
| Italy | 2 | <1% |
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| New Zealand | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 576 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 102 | 17% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 63 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 59 | 10% |
| Researcher | 39 | 7% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 39 | 7% |
| Other | 108 | 18% |
| Unknown | 176 | 30% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 317 | 54% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 13 | 2% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 11 | 2% |
| Psychology | 10 | 2% |
| Engineering | 6 | 1% |
| Other | 34 | 6% |
| Unknown | 195 | 33% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 31. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 July 2022.
All research outputs
#1,287,539
of 25,709,917 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#2,689
of 13,139 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#12,340
of 242,393 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#60
of 239 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,709,917 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,139 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 242,393 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 239 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.