↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Post‐surgical chemotherapy versus surgery alone for resectable gastric cancer

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, September 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (88th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
58 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
132 Mendeley
Title
Post‐surgical chemotherapy versus surgery alone for resectable gastric cancer
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, September 2013
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd008415.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Rafael Diaz‐Nieto, Rafael Orti‐Rodríguez, Marc Winslet

Abstract

For gastric cancer surgery is the mainstay treatment. Chemotherapy seems to improve the survival results. But chemotherapy is not a complication-free therapy and its role has been questioned by some trials.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 132 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 132 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 19 14%
Student > Bachelor 16 12%
Researcher 14 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 9%
Other 10 8%
Other 18 14%
Unknown 43 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 56 42%
Nursing and Health Professions 8 6%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 5 4%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 2%
Computer Science 2 2%
Other 12 9%
Unknown 46 35%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 June 2023.
All research outputs
#2,979,110
of 25,457,297 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#5,577
of 11,499 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#25,045
of 210,423 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#121
of 231 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,457,297 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,499 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 40.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 210,423 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 231 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.