↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Stent graft types for endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, March 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
9 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
52 Mendeley
Title
Stent graft types for endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, March 2013
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd008447.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Duffy JM, Rolph R, Clough RE, Modarai B, Taylor P, Waltham M

Abstract

The UK prevalence of abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) is estimated at 4.9% in over 65-year olds. Progressive and unpredictable enlargement can lead to rupture. Endovascular repair of AAAs involves a stent graft system being introduced via the femoral artery and manipulated within the aorta under radiological guidance. Following endograft deployment, a seal is formed at the proximal and distal landing zones to exclude the aneurysm sac from the circulation. With the increasing popularity of endovascular repair there has been an increase in the number of commercially available stent graft designs on the market.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 52 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 2%
Australia 1 2%
Unknown 50 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 15%
Researcher 8 15%
Student > Master 7 13%
Other 5 10%
Professor > Associate Professor 5 10%
Other 14 27%
Unknown 5 10%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 27 52%
Engineering 3 6%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 6%
Unspecified 2 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 4%
Other 8 15%
Unknown 7 13%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 April 2013.
All research outputs
#13,380,993
of 22,703,044 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#10,075
of 12,310 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#105,860
of 197,824 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#174
of 212 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,703,044 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,310 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 30.3. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 197,824 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 212 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.