| Title |
Biofeedback for treatment of chronic idiopathic constipation in adults
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, March 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd008486.pub2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Sue Woodward, Christine Norton, Pauline Chiarelli |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 2 | 50% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 25% |
| Unknown | 1 | 25% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 75% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 25% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 419 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 2 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Chile | 1 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 414 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 71 | 17% |
| Student > Bachelor | 49 | 12% |
| Researcher | 40 | 10% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 34 | 8% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 34 | 8% |
| Other | 87 | 21% |
| Unknown | 104 | 25% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 148 | 35% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 52 | 12% |
| Psychology | 22 | 5% |
| Unspecified | 17 | 4% |
| Social Sciences | 12 | 3% |
| Other | 51 | 12% |
| Unknown | 117 | 28% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 June 2023.
All research outputs
#6,401,178
of 25,457,297 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#7,678
of 11,499 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#56,112
of 238,228 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#137
of 211 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,457,297 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,499 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 40.0. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 238,228 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 211 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.