↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Exercise interventions for shoulder dysfunction in patients treated for head and neck cancer

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (75th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
8 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
61 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
333 Mendeley
Title
Exercise interventions for shoulder dysfunction in patients treated for head and neck cancer
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2012
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd008693.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Alan PV Carvalho, Flávia MR Vital, Bernardo GO Soares

Abstract

Shoulder dysfunction is a common problem in patients treated for head and neck cancer. Both neck dissections and radiotherapy can cause morbidity to the shoulder joint. Exercise interventions have been suggested as a treatment option for this population.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 333 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Canada 2 <1%
France 1 <1%
Unknown 330 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 54 16%
Student > Bachelor 41 12%
Researcher 33 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 27 8%
Other 18 5%
Other 55 17%
Unknown 105 32%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 99 30%
Nursing and Health Professions 56 17%
Sports and Recreations 19 6%
Psychology 12 4%
Social Sciences 10 3%
Other 24 7%
Unknown 113 34%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 August 2016.
All research outputs
#6,599,710
of 25,457,297 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#7,870
of 11,499 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#42,824
of 174,458 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#115
of 173 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,457,297 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,499 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 40.0. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 174,458 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 173 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.