| Title |
'Third wave' cognitive and behavioural therapies versus other psychological therapies for depression
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd008704.pub2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Vivien Hunot, Theresa HM Moore, Deborah M Caldwell, Toshi A Furukawa, Philippa Davies, Hannah Jones, Mina Honyashiki, Peiyao Chen, Glyn Lewis, Rachel Churchill |
| Abstract |
So-called 'third wave' cognitive and behavioural therapies represents a new generation of psychological therapies that are increasingly being used in the treatment of psychological problems. However, the effectiveness and acceptability of third wave cognitive and behavioural therapy (CBT) approaches as a treatment for depression compared with other psychological therapies remain unclear. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 40 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 9 | 23% |
| Canada | 3 | 8% |
| United States | 3 | 8% |
| Netherlands | 2 | 5% |
| Japan | 2 | 5% |
| Ecuador | 1 | 3% |
| Singapore | 1 | 3% |
| Spain | 1 | 3% |
| France | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 16 | 40% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 25 | 63% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 8 | 20% |
| Scientists | 5 | 13% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 1 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 653 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 5 | <1% |
| Japan | 2 | <1% |
| Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 643 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 117 | 18% |
| Student > Bachelor | 90 | 14% |
| Researcher | 71 | 11% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 71 | 11% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 52 | 8% |
| Other | 117 | 18% |
| Unknown | 135 | 21% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 240 | 37% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 109 | 17% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 51 | 8% |
| Social Sciences | 29 | 4% |
| Neuroscience | 15 | 2% |
| Other | 47 | 7% |
| Unknown | 162 | 25% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 101. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 February 2023.
All research outputs
#423,420
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#741
of 13,149 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,258
of 226,758 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#12
of 212 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,149 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 226,758 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 212 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.