| Title |
Single‐incision sling operations for urinary incontinence in women
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2023
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd008709.pub4 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Emily Carter, Eugenie E Johnson, Madeleine Still, Aalya S Al-Assaf, Andrew Bryant, Patricia Aluko, Stephen T Jeffery, Arjun Nambiar |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 3 | 60% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 20% |
| Unknown | 1 | 20% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 4 | 80% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 20% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 20 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 20 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Other | 3 | 15% |
| Student > Master | 2 | 10% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 2 | 10% |
| Lecturer | 1 | 5% |
| Student > Bachelor | 1 | 5% |
| Other | 4 | 20% |
| Unknown | 7 | 35% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 6 | 30% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 3 | 15% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 1 | 5% |
| Unspecified | 1 | 5% |
| Sports and Recreations | 1 | 5% |
| Other | 1 | 5% |
| Unknown | 7 | 35% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 March 2024.
All research outputs
#6,413,913
of 25,806,763 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#8,025
of 13,140 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#91,405
of 364,916 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#72
of 100 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,806,763 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,140 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.9. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 364,916 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 100 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.