↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Interventions for the management of dry mouth: topical therapies

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, December 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (85th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
21 X users
facebook
4 Facebook pages
wikipedia
10 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
258 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
501 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Interventions for the management of dry mouth: topical therapies
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, December 2011
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd008934.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Susan Furness, Helen V Worthington, Gemma Bryan, Sarah Birchenough, Roddy McMillan

Abstract

Xerostomia (the feeling of dry mouth) is a common symptom especially in older adults. Causes of dry mouth include medications, autoimmune disease (Sjögren's Syndrome), radiotherapy or chemotherapy for cancer, hormone disorders and infections.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 21 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 501 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Colombia 2 <1%
Indonesia 1 <1%
Chile 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Ireland 1 <1%
Belgium 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 493 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 86 17%
Student > Bachelor 54 11%
Researcher 48 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 48 10%
Student > Postgraduate 28 6%
Other 89 18%
Unknown 148 30%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 204 41%
Nursing and Health Professions 43 9%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 18 4%
Psychology 15 3%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 9 2%
Other 50 10%
Unknown 162 32%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 29. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 February 2024.
All research outputs
#1,374,615
of 25,543,275 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#2,937
of 13,150 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#8,498
of 247,649 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#33
of 216 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,543,275 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,150 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 247,649 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 216 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.