| Title |
Combination pharmacotherapy for the treatment of neuropathic pain in adults
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd008943.pub2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Luis Enrique Chaparro, Philip J Wiffen, R Andrew Moore, Ian Gilron |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 19 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 3 | 16% |
| Italy | 2 | 11% |
| Spain | 1 | 5% |
| Australia | 1 | 5% |
| Canada | 1 | 5% |
| United States | 1 | 5% |
| Unknown | 10 | 53% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 15 | 79% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 11% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 5% |
| Scientists | 1 | 5% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 435 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 3 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | <1% |
| Chile | 1 | <1% |
| Colombia | 1 | <1% |
| Norway | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 427 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 57 | 13% |
| Researcher | 51 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 47 | 11% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 40 | 9% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 33 | 8% |
| Other | 103 | 24% |
| Unknown | 104 | 24% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 188 | 43% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 24 | 6% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 22 | 5% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 19 | 4% |
| Neuroscience | 18 | 4% |
| Other | 51 | 12% |
| Unknown | 113 | 26% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 27. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 February 2024.
All research outputs
#1,450,145
of 25,750,437 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#3,072
of 13,136 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#7,889
of 178,645 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#35
of 180 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,750,437 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,136 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 33.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 178,645 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 180 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.