Title |
Conservative interventions for treating hyperextension injuries of the proximal interphalangeal joints of the fingers
|
---|---|
Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, February 2013
|
DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd009030.pub2 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Joelle Chalmer, Megan Blakeway, Zoe Adams, Stephen J Milan |
Abstract |
Immobilisation and early motion (protected or unrestricted) are both used following hyperextension injuries to the proximal interphalangeal (PIP) joint of the finger. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 2 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 2 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 129 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 2 | 2% |
Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
Canada | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 125 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 29 | 22% |
Student > Bachelor | 15 | 12% |
Student > Postgraduate | 10 | 8% |
Other | 9 | 7% |
Researcher | 9 | 7% |
Other | 22 | 17% |
Unknown | 35 | 27% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 49 | 38% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 16 | 12% |
Psychology | 6 | 5% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 4 | 3% |
Sports and Recreations | 3 | 2% |
Other | 11 | 9% |
Unknown | 40 | 31% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 March 2013.
All research outputs
#20,011,936
of 25,457,297 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#10,818
of 11,499 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#152,052
of 205,393 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#188
of 203 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,457,297 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,499 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 40.0. This one is in the 5th percentile – i.e., 5% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 205,393 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 203 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 6th percentile – i.e., 6% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.