| Title |
Interventions for smoking cessation in Indigenous populations
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd009046.pub2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Kristin V Carson, Malcolm P Brinn, Matthew Peters, Antony Veale, Adrian J Esterman, Brian J Smith |
| Abstract |
Tobacco use in Indigenous populations (people who have inhabited a country for thousands of years) is often double that of the non-Indigenous population. A disproportionate burden of substance-related morbidity and mortality exists as a result. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 40% |
| Mexico | 1 | 20% |
| Australia | 1 | 20% |
| Unknown | 1 | 20% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 4 | 80% |
| Scientists | 1 | 20% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 296 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 5 | 2% |
| Germany | 2 | <1% |
| Switzerland | 1 | <1% |
| Australia | 1 | <1% |
| France | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 286 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 53 | 18% |
| Researcher | 50 | 17% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 37 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 26 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 16 | 5% |
| Other | 45 | 15% |
| Unknown | 69 | 23% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 82 | 28% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 37 | 13% |
| Psychology | 35 | 12% |
| Social Sciences | 25 | 8% |
| Computer Science | 7 | 2% |
| Other | 30 | 10% |
| Unknown | 80 | 27% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 30. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 September 2016.
All research outputs
#1,339,135
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#2,827
of 13,149 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#8,636
of 255,424 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#31
of 235 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,149 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 255,424 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 235 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.