| Title |
Interventions for improving modifiable risk factor control in the secondary prevention of stroke
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, May 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd009103.pub2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Kate E Lager, Amit K Mistri, Kamlesh Khunti, Victoria J Haunton, Aung K Sett, Andrew D Wilson |
| Abstract |
People with stroke or transient ischaemic attack (TIA) are at increased risk of future stroke and other cardiovascular events. Evidence-based strategies for secondary stroke prevention have been established. However, the implementation of prevention strategies could be improved. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 50% |
| Colombia | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 290 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| Ireland | 1 | <1% |
| Australia | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 286 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 44 | 15% |
| Researcher | 41 | 14% |
| Student > Master | 38 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 25 | 9% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 20 | 7% |
| Other | 77 | 27% |
| Unknown | 45 | 16% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 93 | 32% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 55 | 19% |
| Psychology | 17 | 6% |
| Unspecified | 14 | 5% |
| Social Sciences | 12 | 4% |
| Other | 41 | 14% |
| Unknown | 58 | 20% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 May 2014.
All research outputs
#16,731,747
of 25,595,500 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#11,420
of 13,156 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#138,919
of 242,620 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#193
of 218 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,595,500 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,156 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.8. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 242,620 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 218 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.