↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Treatment for recurrent vulvovaginal candidiasis (thrush)

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, May 2011
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
6 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
15 Mendeley
Title
Treatment for recurrent vulvovaginal candidiasis (thrush)
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, May 2011
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd009151
Authors

Georga Cooke, Cathy Watson, Jane Smith, Marie Pirotta, Mieke L van Driel

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 15 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 15 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 4 27%
Researcher 3 20%
Student > Bachelor 2 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 7%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 7%
Other 3 20%
Unknown 1 7%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 8 53%
Psychology 2 13%
Immunology and Microbiology 1 7%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 7%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 7%
Other 1 7%
Unknown 1 7%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 June 2016.
All research outputs
#8,571,053
of 25,457,297 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#9,070
of 11,499 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#45,493
of 121,501 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#62
of 86 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,457,297 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,499 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 40.0. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 121,501 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 86 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.