| Title |
Interventions for recruiting smokers into cessation programmes
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, December 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd009187.pub2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
José S Marcano Belisario, Michelle N Bruggeling, Laura H Gunn, Serena Brusamento, Josip Car |
| Abstract |
Tobacco control is a top public health priority around the globe due to the high prevalence of cigarette smoking and its associated morbidity and mortality. Much effort has been focused on establishing the effectiveness of different smoking cessation strategies. This review, however, aims to address the initial challenge faced by smoking cessation programmes: recruitment of smokers. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 50% |
| Canada | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 50% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 260 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 2 | <1% |
| United States | 2 | <1% |
| India | 1 | <1% |
| Switzerland | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 254 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 42 | 16% |
| Researcher | 41 | 16% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 33 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 22 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 16 | 6% |
| Other | 36 | 14% |
| Unknown | 70 | 27% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 74 | 28% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 30 | 12% |
| Psychology | 25 | 10% |
| Social Sciences | 22 | 8% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 7 | 3% |
| Other | 27 | 10% |
| Unknown | 75 | 29% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 May 2019.
All research outputs
#15,799,182
of 25,457,297 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#10,126
of 11,499 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#176,121
of 286,552 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#157
of 190 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,457,297 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,499 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 40.0. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 286,552 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 190 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.