↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Telephone delivered interventions for reducing morbidity and mortality in people with HIV infection

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, May 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (81st percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
8 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
25 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
572 Mendeley
Title
Telephone delivered interventions for reducing morbidity and mortality in people with HIV infection
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, May 2013
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd009189.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sarah Gentry, Michelle HMMT van‐Velthoven, Lorainne Tudor Car, Josip Car

Abstract

This is one of three Cochrane reviews examining the role of the telephone in HIV/AIDS services. Telephone interventions, delivered either by landline or mobile phone, may be useful in the management of people living with HIV (PLHIV) in many situations. Telephone delivered interventions have the potential to reduce costs, save time and facilitate more support for PLHIV.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 572 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 4 <1%
Germany 2 <1%
United States 2 <1%
Norway 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Romania 1 <1%
Unknown 561 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 102 18%
Researcher 76 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 63 11%
Student > Bachelor 53 9%
Student > Postgraduate 31 5%
Other 105 18%
Unknown 142 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 149 26%
Nursing and Health Professions 73 13%
Psychology 65 11%
Social Sciences 46 8%
Computer Science 13 2%
Other 65 11%
Unknown 161 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 November 2017.
All research outputs
#4,727,500
of 25,457,858 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#6,872
of 11,842 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#38,567
of 207,187 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#151
of 274 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,457,858 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 81st percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,842 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 38.9. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 207,187 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 274 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.