Title |
Telephone delivered interventions for reducing morbidity and mortality in people with HIV infection
|
---|---|
Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, May 2013
|
DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd009189.pub2 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Sarah Gentry, Michelle HMMT van‐Velthoven, Lorainne Tudor Car, Josip Car |
Abstract |
This is one of three Cochrane reviews examining the role of the telephone in HIV/AIDS services. Telephone interventions, delivered either by landline or mobile phone, may be useful in the management of people living with HIV (PLHIV) in many situations. Telephone delivered interventions have the potential to reduce costs, save time and facilitate more support for PLHIV. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 3 | 38% |
United Kingdom | 2 | 25% |
Unknown | 3 | 38% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 5 | 63% |
Scientists | 2 | 25% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 13% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 572 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 4 | <1% |
Germany | 2 | <1% |
United States | 2 | <1% |
Norway | 1 | <1% |
Spain | 1 | <1% |
Romania | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 561 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 102 | 18% |
Researcher | 76 | 13% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 63 | 11% |
Student > Bachelor | 53 | 9% |
Student > Postgraduate | 31 | 5% |
Other | 105 | 18% |
Unknown | 142 | 25% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 149 | 26% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 73 | 13% |
Psychology | 65 | 11% |
Social Sciences | 46 | 8% |
Computer Science | 13 | 2% |
Other | 65 | 11% |
Unknown | 161 | 28% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 November 2017.
All research outputs
#4,727,500
of 25,457,858 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#6,872
of 11,842 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#38,567
of 207,187 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#151
of 274 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,457,858 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 81st percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,842 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 38.9. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 207,187 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 274 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.