↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Fluphenazine versus low‐potency first‐generation antipsychotic drugs for schizophrenia

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, August 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (93rd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (72nd percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
2 blogs
policy
1 policy source
twitter
8 X users
wikipedia
7 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
27 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
103 Mendeley
Title
Fluphenazine versus low‐potency first‐generation antipsychotic drugs for schizophrenia
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, August 2014
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd009230.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Magdolna Tardy, Maximilian Huhn, Rolf R Engel, Stefan Leucht

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 103 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
South Africa 1 <1%
Unknown 102 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 19 18%
Student > Bachelor 15 15%
Researcher 9 9%
Other 7 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 6%
Other 14 14%
Unknown 33 32%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 28 27%
Psychology 12 12%
Nursing and Health Professions 9 9%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 5 5%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 2%
Other 8 8%
Unknown 39 38%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 22. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 March 2024.
All research outputs
#1,727,702
of 25,728,855 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#3,672
of 13,136 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#16,919
of 241,795 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#64
of 236 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,728,855 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,136 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 241,795 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 236 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.